McNelis
McNelis v. County of El Dorado
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
A 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANNE MCNELIS, individually and as No. 2:22-cv-00369-TLN-JDP Guardian ad Litem for L.N., 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. COUNTY OF EL DORADO, KIMBERLY
PIERCE, CAITLYN HAYDEN,
SAMANTHA HODGE, and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Defendants.
18 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Kimberly Pierce (“Pierce”) and Caitlyn Hayden’s (“Hayden”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff Anne McNelis (“Plaintiff”), acting on behalf of herself and as guardian ad litem for minor L.N., opposed the motion. (ECF No. 19.) Defendants replied. (ECF No. 22.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion. ///
Defendants County of El Dorado (“County”) and Samantha Hodge (“Hodge”) do not join 26 in this motion and instead filed Answers to the Complaint. (ECF Nos. 16, 17.) 27 When the Court discusses McNelis and L.N. together, it will address them collectively as “Plaintiffs.” …