Quick

(PC) Jackson v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20231:19-cv-01591California941 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORNEL JACKSON, No. 1:19-cv-01591-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. 123) JASON QUICK, et al.,

Defendants. 16 The assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted to the extent that it seeks dismissal of Jackson’s conspiracy and access-to-the-court claims and denied to the extent that it seeks dismissal of Jackson’s legal mail claims. (Doc 123). The parties were permitted twenty-one days to file written objections. (Id. at 18). On October 27, 2022, Defendants filed objections, and on November 7, 2022, Jackson filed objections. (Docs. 126, 127). According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including the parties’ objections, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.