(PS) Selck v. Mikuni Restaurants

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20222:22-cv-02141California1,928 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MORREY SELCK, No. 2:22–cv–2141–KJM–KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT

v. MATTER JURISDITION MIKUNI RESTAURANTS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel in this action, filed a complaint against defendants Mikuni Restaurants, California Bank and Trust, First Japanese Baptist Church, Kokio Arai, Taro Arai, Helen Okumura, Carmalita Cruz, and John Meyer. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff paid the filing fee and the Clerk issued subpoenas for plaintiff to serve defendants. (ECF No. 2.) The court noted plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a cause of action that implicates the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, and so ordered plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff responded, clarifying his intent regarding his suit against defendants. (ECF No. 6.) However, plaintiff’s assertions do not rectify the court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.