Trate

(PC) Milton v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20231:22-cv-00988California695 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 KYLE DAVID MILTON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00988-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT CERTAIN v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED B.M. TRATE, et al., (ECF Nos. 1 & 11) Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE Kyle David Milton (“Plaintiff’) is incarcerated at Atwater U.S. Penitentiary and is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on August 8, 2022. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 11). The Court found that only the following claims should proceed past the screening stage: Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Trate, Dr. Paltenghi, and Dr. Grassely for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs and Plaintiff’s Fifth Amendment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.