(PC) Kamilchu v. County of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDUARD KAMILCHU, No. 2:21-cv-02245 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights through deliberate indifference to dangerous conditions of plaintiff’s confinement. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for screening (ECF No. 13) and his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 7). For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff’s FAC is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. //// //// //// //// //// //// IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 7.) Accordingly, plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis will be 4 …