Ramos
(PC) Matthews v. Ramos
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 GENE RAYMOND MATTHEWS, III, Case No. 1:22-cv-01508-SAB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION
S. RAMOS, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF Defendants. CERTAIN CLAIMS 14 (ECF Nos. 16, 17)
16 Plaintiff Gene Raymond Matthews, III is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 9, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, and found that he stated a cognizable claim against Defendants S. Ramos and G. King for failing to intervene during the use of assault by fellow inmates on November 1, 2021, and subsequently using force on Plaintiff. Plaintiff also stated a cognizable claim for excessive force against Defendants Ujeda and John Does one through three for also allegedly using excessive force upon him on November 1, 2021. (ECF No. 16.) …