Marsh
Marsh v. Bank of Sierra, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRANCE MARSH, Case No. 1:22-cv-00508-JLT-CDB
Plaintiff, THIRD SCREENING ORDER AND FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS DISMISSING
13 v. PLAINTIFF’S INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS CLAIM BANK OF SIERRA, INC. et al. (ECF No. 12) Defendants.
TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE
17 18 Plaintiff Terrance Marsh (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action against Defendants Bank of Sierra, Inc., Margaret Droese, and Karen Mitchell (“Defendants”). Before this Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint. (ECF No. 12). Accordingly, the Court shall screen Plaintiff’s second amended complaint. Procedural Background On April 29, 2022, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants for a violation of the Equal Protection Clause and a claim of discrimination under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). (ECF No. 1). That same day,…