Gamboa
(PC) Garces v. Gamboa
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LUIS MANUEL GARCES, Case No. 1:21-cv-00392-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO STAY SCHEDULING ORDER
v. (ECF No. 90).
D. HERNANDEZ, et al.,
14 Defendants.
16 Plaintiff Luis Manuel Garces (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to stay, or in the alternative extend, the scheduling order (ECF No. 90). Plaintiff’s motion requests a general stay because Plaintiff became ill after going on a fourteen- day hunger strike based on alleged interference with Plaintiff’s kosher meals. (ECF No. 90, p. 1- 2). In the alternative, Plaintiff requests that the scheduling order be extended by sixty days. The Court does not find that Plaintiff’s situation warrants a stay in discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. (c)(1) (“The court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment,…