(PC) Bullard v. Sacramento Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20232:22-cv-01914California330 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONDELL DONTA BULLARD, No. 2:22-cv-1914 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER & FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO POLICE

DEPARTMENT,

15 Defendant.

17 By order filed November 30, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and //// //// ] IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.