Fisher

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 JAMES GRZESLO, 1:21-cv-01371-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION AND OBJECTIONS

v. (ECF No. 46)

B. SAUZO,

14 Defendant. 15 16 17 Plaintiff James Grzelso is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s First 19 Amendment claim regarding Defendant Suazo’s actions in relation to Plaintiff’s prayer document. 20 Plaintiff’s motion addresses the merits of his case and several procedural complaints, 21 including “Federal prohibited ex parte communications between this Court and defense counsel DAG Bragg,” “deficiency of required proof of service,” coercive acts of defense counsel,” and “validation of criminal hate crime and antisemitism.”1 (ECF No. 46, at p. 1). The filing is lengthy and at times difficult to understand but appears to assert that defense counsel is making unsupported arguments in this case and that defense counsel and the Court have engaged in ex parte…