Brevick

(PC) Perry v. Brevick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20232:21-cv-00065California1,473 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACK LEE PERRY, No. 2: 21-cv-0065 WBS KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER BREVICK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel. (ECF No. 38.) For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion to compel is denied. Plaintiff’s Claims This action proceeds on plaintiff’s original complaint filed January 11, 2021, against defendants Brevick and Moran as to the following claims: 1) on January 16, 2019, defendant Brevick allegedly violated the Eighth Amendment by leaving plaintiff’s cell in such disarray that it caused plaintiff to injure himself; 2) defendant Brevick allegedly violated plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment right to adequate medical care by rendering plaintiff’s CPAP machine unusable; and 3) defendant Moran allegedly violated the Eighth Amendment by denying plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.