Pfeiffer

(PC) Rodriguez v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20231:21-cv-00572California4,500 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-00572-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT

v. SPAETH’S MOTION TO DISMISS BE

GRANTED

13 HARPREET SINGH, et al., (ECF No. 50). 14 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

17 Before the Court is Defendant Martha Spaeth’s (“Defendant Spaeth”) motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint.1 (ECF No. 50). The matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. For the following reasons, the Court recommends that Defendant Spaeth’s motion to dismiss be granted. I. BACKGROUND Manuel Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding through counsel in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on April 2, 2021, alleging claims against Defendants Christian Pfeiffer, Michael Felder, Harpreet 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.