Heitkoetter

Heitkoetter v. Domm

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20231:22-cv-00368California795 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARKUS HEITKOETTER, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-0368-AWI-BAM Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

v. ECF No. 26 KARL DOMM, Defendant. 16 17 Currently pending before the Court is a motion to amend the first amended complaint filed by Plaintiffs Markus Heitkoetter and Rockwell Trading Services, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) on December 22, 2022. (Doc. 26.) Defendant Karl Domm (“Defendant”) filed a statement of non-opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion to amend the first amended complaint. (Doc. 30.) Based on the absence of opposition, the matter is deemed submitted on the record without the need for oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). Having considered the unopposed motion and the record in this case, Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend will be GRANTED. DISCUSSION Plaintiff’s motion to amend, which was filed prior to issuance of a Scheduling Order deadline, is considered under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.