Riaz
Riaz v. Henry
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMREEN RIAZ, No. 1:21-CV-00911-ADA-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING IN PART AND
GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS PURUSANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) NATHAN HENRY, et al., (ECF Nos. 6, 12) Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND
THE COMPLAINT WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants’, County of Tulare and Ernest Ceballos (“County Defendants”) and Defendants’, City of Visalia, Nathan Henry, Edvin Canto, and Art Alvarez (“City Defendants”) separate motions to dismiss. (ECF Nos. 6, 12.) For the reasons explained below, the Court will grant, in part, and deny, in part, the County Defendants’ motion to dismiss and will grant, in part, and deny, in part, City Defendants’ motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background The following facts are discernable from Plaintiff Samreen Riaz’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint. …