Riaz

Riaz v. Henry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20231:21-cv-00911California8,952 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMREEN RIAZ, No. 1:21-CV-00911-ADA-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING IN PART AND

GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS PURUSANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) NATHAN HENRY, et al., (ECF Nos. 6, 12) Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND

THE COMPLAINT WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants’, County of Tulare and Ernest Ceballos (“County Defendants”) and Defendants’, City of Visalia, Nathan Henry, Edvin Canto, and Art Alvarez (“City Defendants”) separate motions to dismiss. (ECF Nos. 6, 12.) For the reasons explained below, the Court will grant, in part, and deny, in part, the County Defendants’ motion to dismiss and will grant, in part, and deny, in part, City Defendants’ motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background The following facts are discernable from Plaintiff Samreen Riaz’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.