Catanghal

Catanghal v. Greyhound Lines Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20231:22-cv-00961California3,522 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD DE LEON CATANGHAL, Case No. 1:22-cv-00961-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

v. DISMISSED

GREYHOUND LINES, INC., (ECF NO. 1)

Defendant. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

ORDER DIRECING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE

18 19 Plaintiff Gerald De Leon Catanghal, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this 20 action on August 2, 2022, under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12112 21 et seq., and alleges that Defendant Greyhound Lines, Inc. has engaged in discriminatory employment practices. Plaintiff further alleges that Defendant has engaged in unfair labor practices pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7116. The Court previously screened the complaint and found that Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 4). The Court gave Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint to cure the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.