(PS) Hawkins v. Kaiser Permanente

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20232:22-cv-00034California1,878 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KET T. HAWKINS, Jr., et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-00034-KJM-JDP (PS)

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS AND DENYING THEIR MOTION

TO EXPEDITE RULING

KAISER PERMANENTE SACRAMENTO, et al., ECF Nos. 2 & 3 15 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS: 16 (1) FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, OR (2) STAND BY THEIR COMPLAINT

SUBJECT TO DISMISSAL

19 ECF No. 1

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

21 Plaintiffs, proceeding without counsel as heirs and representatives of the estate of Ket Hawkins, Sr. (“the decedent”), bring this action under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. ECF No. 1. They allege that defendants wrongfully denied emergency medical care to the decedent and discriminated against the decedent because of his disabilities. Plaintiffs cannot pursue claims on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.