Santoro

(PC) Hardy v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20231:21-cv-00327California2,149 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTIN HARDY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00327-ADA-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL AFTER

DISCOVERY DISPUTE HEARING

R. MORENO, et al.,

(ECF No. 92) Defendants. 14 Kristin Hardy (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s unreasonable search and seizure claims against defendants Valencia, Moreno, Chavez, Dohs, and Ceballos, based on Plaintiff’s allegations that after Plaintiff was subjected to a full body scan, he was immediately subjected to an additional strip search without justification. (ECF Nos. 22, 42, & 43). On September 26, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel production of documents and for in camera review. (ECF No. 92). On October 12, 2022, Defendants submitted documents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.