(PS) Ringgold v. Burgett Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EDWARD RINGGOLD, No. 2:22-cv-00836-DAD-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND BURGETT, INC., doing business as
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
PIANODISC, et al.,
Defendants.
17 Plaintiff proceeds pro se with a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), a claim under the Fair Housing Act, and state law claims for wrongful termination and disability discrimination. (ECF No. 1, Complaint.) This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Defendant, Burgett, Inc., doing business as Pianodisc (“Pianodisc”), has filed a motion to strike plaintiff’s amended complaint filed on October 27, 2022, under Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In the alternative, Pianodisc moves to dismiss certain claims under Rule 12(b). Plaintiff opposes the motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the matter is submitted upon the record and briefs on file. The hearing set for January 11, 2023,…