(SS) Robles v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20231:22-cv-00598California453 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LADAWN BENCIA ROBLES, Case No. 1:22-cv-00598-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’

STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND

v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND KILOLO KIJAKAZI, REMANDING CASE1

Defendant. (Doc. No. 15)

ORDER MOOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

17 (Doc. No. 12) 18 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed December 20, 2022. (Doc. No. 15). Plaintiff Ladawn Bencia Robles and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that this case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.). The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.