Zysman

(PC) Zepeda v. Zysman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20232:22-cv-01860California1,787 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 PAUL ZEPEDA, Case No. 2:22-cv-01860-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS M. ZYSMAN, et al., ECF No. 2 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: (1) PROCEED ONLY WITH HIS

EIGHTH AMENDMENT

DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE

CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT

ZYSMAN; OR (2) DELAY SERVING ANY

DEFENDANT AND FILE AN

AMENDED COMPLAINT ECF No. 1 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 21 22 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, alleges that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to provide him with adequate medical care. ECF No. 1 at 1. Plaintiff also alleges that defendants’ actions were negligent, inflicted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.