Davis

Davis v. Walmart Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20231:22-cv-01381California382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT DONALD DAVIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01381-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER TO MICHAEL DOMINGO TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

v. SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR

PRACTICE IN THIS COURT WITHOUT

WALMART INC., ET AL., FIRST SEEKING ADMISSION

Defendants. ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

TEN DAY-DEADLINE

18 On October 27, 2022, the Clerk of Court directed Plaintiff’s attorney, Michael Domingo, to register for admission to this Court. (ECF No. 5.) To date, Attorney Domingo has failed to comply with this direction and remains ineligible to prosecute this action. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.