Davis
Davis v. Walmart Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT DONALD DAVIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01381-CDB
Plaintiff, ORDER TO MICHAEL DOMINGO TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS
v. SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR
PRACTICE IN THIS COURT WITHOUT
WALMART INC., ET AL., FIRST SEEKING ADMISSION
Defendants. ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
TEN DAY-DEADLINE
18 On October 27, 2022, the Clerk of Court directed Plaintiff’s attorney, Michael Domingo, to register for admission to this Court. (ECF No. 5.) To date, Attorney Domingo has failed to comply with this direction and remains ineligible to prosecute this action. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions…