(HC) Kleinschmidt v. Sacramento County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES KLEINSCHMIDT, No. 2:22-cv-01899-EFB (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent. 16 Petitioner commenced this action while confined to a county jail as a pretrial detainee. ECF No. 1 at 1. He proceeds without counsel and seeks a writ of habeas corpus1 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging that he is being “detained for a falsified case on purpose knowingly and intentionally and [is] being terrorized, tortured, and victimized.” Id. at 2. As discussed below, the court will recommend that the petition be dismissed. See Rule 4, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases (requiring summary dismissal of habeas petition if, upon initial review by a judge, it plainly appears “that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court”). ///// ///// ///// 27 1 Petitioner also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 6. That request is granted. To the…