Sapien

(PC) Vaccaro v. Sapien

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20232:22-cv-01984California1,521 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DION JERMAINE RANDOL VACCARO, No. 2:22-cv-1984-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SAPIEN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel1 in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In addition to filing a complaint, he has filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis The court has reviewed plaintiff’s application and finds that it makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). ///// ///// 27 1 The court notes, in response to plaintiff’s request for proof of the same, that he proceeds pro se. See ECF No. 5. The Clerk of the Court shall terminate ECF No. 5. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.