Weaver
(PC) Thomas v. Weaver
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PRENTICE R. THOMAS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01492-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
B. WEAVER, et al., DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO
STATE A CLAIM
Defendants. ECF No. 10
FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Prentice R. Thomas (“Plaintiff”) is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and informa pauperis in this civil rights action. The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, and he was granted leave to amend. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 10.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding in pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary…