Heitkoetter

Heitkoetter v. Domm

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20231:22-cv-00368California5,090 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARKUS HEITKOETTER, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-0368-AWI-BAM Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

v. ECF No. 22 KARL DOMM,

INTERIM PROTECTIVE ORDER

Defendant.

16

Currently before the Court is the motion for a protective order filed by Plaintiffs Markus Heitkoetter and Rockwell Trading Services, LLC (“Rockwell” or “Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs seek to prevent the parties from publishing documents or information obtained through discovery on the Internet. The parties filed a Joint Statement Re: Discovery Disagreement, and the instant motion has been taken under submission. (Doc. 27.) Having considered the parties’ joint statement, and the entire docket, and for the reasons discussed below, the Court finds entry of a protective order appropriate, and Plaintiffs’ motion will be granted. /// /// /// I. Brief Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiffs bring several claims sounding in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.