Newsom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN HILL, No. 2:19-cv-1680 DAD AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion for the return of property, ECF No. 58, accompanied by a separate motion for all mail from the court to be sealed, ECF No. 58-1. For the reasons stated below, the motions will be denied. Plaintiff asserts in conclusory terms that the warden of Mule Creek State Prison is intentionally separating plaintiff from his property – specifically, his mail – in order to retaliate against plaintiff and to interfere with his ability to prosecute this case. See ECF No. 58 at 1. Plaintiff then accuses the mail room of specific inference with his property. Id. at 2-3. Plaintiff provides no basis for his claim that the warden is personally involved in problems with his mail, nor does he identify any responsible party over whom this court has jurisdiction. There are no facts provided which support…