(SS) Lomeli Navarro v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20231:21-cv-01379California2,783 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 GUADALUPE LOMELI NAVARRO, Case No. 1:21-cv-01379-EPG Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

v. SECURITY COMPLAINT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF Nos. 1, 15).

Defendant. 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding her application for supplemental security income benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 9). Plaintiff presents the following issues: 1. The ALJ’s RFC is unsupported by substantial evidence because the ALJ erred in failing to find Plaintiff’s borderline intellectual functioning, headaches and diabetes severe. 26 2. The ALJ erred in rejecting the opinion of LPC Gordon without adequately …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.