Girish
(PS) Sn v. Girish
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHARMILA SN No. 2:22–cv–01796–KJM–CKD (PS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS
v.
ADRIAN MATA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against several defendants, alleging violations of various state statutes and a federal criminal statute; plaintiff also requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2.) The court granted plaintiff’s IFP request and dismissed the complaint under Rule 12(h)(3) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff was given 28 days to amend the complaint and warned that failure to do so by the required deadline could result in sanctions, including dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to pursuant to Rule 41(b). (Id. at 5.) On December 30, 2022, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (FAC). (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff also filed an Ex Parte Application “for the U.S. Constitution Law of Legal Selection and 26 …