Nelson v. Foster Poultry Farms

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20231:21-cv-00222California445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL NELSON, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-0222 JLT BAM ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ACTION ) SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S v. ) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ) ORDER FOSTER , et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) )

Previously, the parties stipulated to allow Plaintiff to amend his complaint to dismiss the seventh and eighth causes of action with prejudice. (See Doc. 28.) On December 12, 2022, the Court approved the terms of the parties’ stipulation and ordered Plaintiff to file his First Amended Complaint within three days of the date of service of the order. (Doc. 29.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed his amended complaint. The Local Rules, corresponding with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, provide: “Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.