Williams v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS WILLIAMS, No. 2:19-cv-2345-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, (ECF No. 39.) v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. THOMAS WILLIAMS, No. 2:20-cv-598-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, (ECF No. 43.) v. ORDER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTES (CONSOLIDATED FOR DISCOVERY) COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 21 On January 3, 2023, the parties appeared for a hearing on defendant City of Rancho Cordova’s motions to compel. (Case 2:19-cv-2345 “Carlos” at ECF No. 39; Case 2:20-cv-598 “Thomas” at ECF No. 43.) For the reasons discussed at the hearing and as discussed below, the court GRANTS IN PART defendant’s motions.
1 On July 15, 2021, the assigned district judge consolidated these cases for purposes of discovery. (ECF No. 23.) Discovery motions are referred to the assigned magistrate judge under Local Rule 302(c)(1). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). …