Roush

Roush v. San Joaquin Valley College, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20231:21-cv-00556California2,474 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JENNIFER ROUSH, Case No. 1:21-cv-00556-JLT-BAM

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING

v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

JENNIFER ROUSH’S MOTION TO

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY COLLEGE, KEN AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER TO GUERRERO and DOES 1 through 30, EXTEND TIME FOR EXPERT inclusive, DISCOVERY

Defendants. (Doc. 30)

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Jennifer Roush’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Amend 19 Scheduling Order to Extend Time for Expert Discovery. (Doc. 30.) Defendants San Joaquin 20 Valley College, Inc. dba San Joaquin Valley College and Ken Guerrero (“Defendants”) filed an 21 opposition to the motion. (Doc. 31.) Plaintiff filed a reply on December 28, 2022. (Doc. 32.) 22 The Court finds the motion suitable for decision without the need for oral argument. 23 Accordingly, the hearing on the motion currently set for January 13, 2023, is HEREBY 24 VACATED, and the matter is submitted on the record. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.