Walker

(PC) Davis v. Walker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20232:10-cv-02139California2,305 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNARD DAVIS, No. 2:08-cv-0593 KJM DB Plaintiff, v. JAMES WALKER, et al., Defendants.

KENNARD DAVIS, No. 2:10-cv-2139 KJM DB Plaintiff, v. JAMES WALKER, et al., ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

23 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds with these civil rights actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court are a number of motions plaintiff filed pro se over the last two years. This court has reviewed each motion. They fall into four categories: (1) motions to regain competency //// 28 status and be permitted to proceed pro se (ECF Nos. 248, 249, 258, 263, 264, 2711); (2) motions for a scheduling or status conference (ECF Nos. 263, 265, 266, 267); (3) motions to reinstate previously stricken or denied motions (ECF Nos. 263, 280); and (4) motions for a settlement conference (ECF No. 268). For the reasons set forth below, this court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.