(PC) Taylor v. Commissioner of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9 PRESTON TAYLOR, Case No. 1:20-cv-00798-ADA-SAB (PC)
10 Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
11 v. RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING
DEFENDANT TURNER’S MOTION FOR
12 COMMISSIONER OF CALIFORNIA SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REFERRING MATTER BACK TO
13 REHABILITATION, et al., MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR FURTHER
PROCEEDINGS
14 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 77, 85) 15
16 17 Plaintiff Preston Taylor (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 3, 2022, the assigned United States Magistrate Judge issued findings and 21 recommendations recommending Defendant Turner’s motion for summary judgment be denied. 22 (ECF No. 85.) The findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained 23 notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days after service. (Id. at…