Savoie

(PC) Cruz v. Savoie

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20231:21-cv-01350California521 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-01350-ADA-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (ECF Nos. 17, 18) S. SAVOIE, Defendant. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion for a 35-day Extension of Time to Respond to Findings and Recommendations” and subsequent objections to findings and recommendations both filed on December 1, 2022. (ECF Nos. 17, 18.) Considering the content of the motions, it appears Plaintiff actually seeks reconsideration of the Court’s November 10, 2022 order adopting the findings and recommendations issued on July 29, 2022. (ECF Nos. 9, 16.) Motions to reconsider are committed to the discretion of the trial court. Combs v. Nick Garin Trucking, 825 F.2d 437, 441 (D.C. Cir. 1987); Rodgers v. Watt, 722 F.2d 456, 460 (9th Cir. 1983) (en banc). To succeed, a party must set forth facts or law of a strongly convincing nature to induce the court to reverse its prior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.