Porter

Porter v. Yuba City Police Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20232:20-cv-01554California4,670 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Quiana Lei Porter, No. 2:20-cv-01554-KJM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER V. Yuba City Police Officers Escheman, Hansen, Jensen, Jurado, et al. Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Quiana Porter brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several Yuba City Police Officers. Named defendants Officers Escheman, Hansen, Jensen and Jurado move for summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds, or in the alternative, summary adjudication 20 on plaintiff's claims. Porter moves to strike the motion for summary judgment for not seeking leave of court to file a successive motion for summary judgment. For the reasons below, the court grants defendants’ motion and denies plaintiffs motion. 23 I. BACKGROUND On July 31, 2018, Yuba City police officers arrested Porter. Defs.’ Resp. to Pl.’s 25 Statement of Disputed Facts (SDF) 1, 10, ECF No. 74-1; Pl.’s Resp. to Defs.’ Statement of Undisputed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.