(PC) Mundy v. City and County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20232:23-cv-00059California1,526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANLEY W. MUNDY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00401-ADA-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER SEVERING AND TRANSFERRING

v. CERTAIN CLAIMS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL (ECF No. 22) STAFF, et al., 14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Stanley A. Mundy is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on April 6, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) On July 13, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found that no cognizable claims were stated, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 16.) In that order, the Court specifically noted that should Plaintiff amend the complaint to state a cognizable claim against individuals at Sacramento County Jail, such claims may be severed from this action. (Id. at 8 n. 1.) On October 11, 2022, Plaintiff timely filed a first amended complaint, which is before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). (ECF No. 22.) /// /// …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.