Boyer

Kemper Independence Ins. Co. v. Boyer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20232:22-cv-01458California430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEMPER INDEPENDENCE No. 2:22-cv-1458 MCE DB INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff, ORDER v. ALLAN DOUGLAS BOYER;

RAYMOND MENDOZA JR.,

16 Defendants. 18 On November 18, 2022, plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment against defendant Allan Douglas Boyer and noticed the motion for hearing before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19). (ECF No. 15.) The motion is currently set for hearing before the undersigned on January 13, 2023. It does not appear, however, that plaintiff filed proof of service of notice of the motion on the defendants. It is true that service of a motion for default judgement on a defaulting party is not required. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) (requiring that written notice of an application for default judgment be served upon the party against whom judgment is sought only if that party “has

1 Defendant Raymond Mendoza Jr. has been dismissed from this action. (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.