Baraona

(PC) Puckett v. Baraona

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20231:21-cv-01448California754 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01448-ADA-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (ECF No. 60) BARAONA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against: (1) Defendants A. Baraona, R. Burnitzki,1 R. Leos, H. Hernandez, E. Diaz, and Doe 1 for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; (2) Defendants R. Leos, for sexual assault in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and (3) Defendants A. Ruiz, R. Martinez, E. Ruiz, G. Meier,2 R. Gutierrez, J. Cruz, K. Allison (Cronister), and Jane Doe Nurse for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of voluntary counsel, filed January 9, 2023. (ECF No. 60.) Plaintiff requests…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.