Brooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VALERIE BROOKS, No. 2:20–cv–1832–DAD–KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF No. 23.) BARCELINO CONTINENTAL CORP., Defendant. 16 This case concerns plaintiff’s allegations that defendant failed to, among other things, operate its website in a manner consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act; defendant answered, denying liability. (See ECF Nos. 1, 8.) Presently pending before the undersigned is defendant’s motion for a protective order, opposed by plaintiff. (ECF Nos. 23, 25, 26.) Defendant argues the court should protect it from having to respond to all of plaintiff’s discovery requests because the complaint fails to sufficiently state claims that invoke the court’s subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff argues that because her discovery requests are relevant to the claims in the complaint, which have not been challenged by motion, no protective order should issue. For the reasons stated at the January 10,…