Mobert

(PC) Ruiz v. Mobert

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20231:17-cv-00709California731 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, Case No. 1:17-cv-00709-AWI-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION

FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT

v. (Doc. No. 66) R. MOBERT,

Defendant. 16 On November 9, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the Court, inter alia, reopen this case. (Doc. No. 66). The Court liberally construes the motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. For the reasons stated below, the court denies the motion. The docket reveals that the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss and judgment was entered in favor of the Defendant on August 31, 2021. (Doc. Nos. 64, 65). Plaintiff did not timely file either a Rule 59 motion or appeal the judgment. Indeed, over a year has elapsed since judgment was entered. The construed motion is 9 pages in length. Plaintiff requests that his case be re-opened because he does not speak English. (Doc. No. 66). Additionally, Plaintiff requests an attorney who speaks both…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.