Debbs
Debbs v. Valley Convalscent Hospital
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EURAL DEBBS, SR., Case No. 1:22-cv-00248-AWI-CDB
Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS DISMISSING
v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
VALLEY CONVALSCENT HOSPITAL, (Doc. 11) 15 Defendant. 16 Eural Debbs, Sr. (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. (Docs. 1-2, 5). On March 4, 2022, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (Doc. 4). The Court screened Plaintiff’s FAC on March 21, 2022. (Doc. 6). The Court found Plaintiff’s FAC failed to state a claim against any defendant and provided Plaintiff 30 days to file a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) or notify the Court in writing that he wants to stand on his FAC. Id. Plaintiff failed to respond within the provided 30 days. On May 12, 2022, the Court issued an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court’s orders. (Doc. 7). Plaintiff filed a…