Ciolli

(PC) Barrett v. Ciolli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20231:20-cv-01802California555 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANTHONY BARRETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01802-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-

v. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

TO DISMISS WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS

A. CIOLI, et al.,

14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Anthony Barrett is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 17 this civil rights action proceeding pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 18 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 19 On November 14, 2022, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 68). Defendants 20 served the motion to dismiss on Plaintiff at 69617-061, 505 Wildindigo Run, Columbus, OH, 21 43081.1 (ECF No. 68-3). 22 Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion 23 within twenty-one days (Local Rule 230(l)), but did not do so. Local Rule 230(l) provides that the 24 failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of 25 any opposition to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.