(PS) Amajioyi v. Biomarin Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20232:20-cv-02292California663 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHUCK C. AMAJIOYI, No. 2:20-cv-2292 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Chuck C. Amajioyi is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On November 17, 2020, plaintiff filed a complaint and paid the applicable filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) Accordingly, a summon was issued to plaintiff for service on the defendant. (ECF No. 2.) On December 4, 2020, plaintiff filed a document asking if plaintiff needed “to serve the defendant or is the court going to appoint someone who will serve the defendant?” (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was advised “that pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally a ‘plaintiff is responsible for having the summons and complaint served within the time allowed by Rule 4(m) and must furnish the necessary copies to the person who makes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.