Baughman

(PC) Holmes v. Baughman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20232:20-cv-01496California2,608 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVELL C. HOLMES, No. 2:20-cv-1496 DAD DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs when they required him to use stairs despite having a “no stairs” chrono and he fell injuring his knee. Before the court are: (1) defendant Soltanian’s motion to compel plaintiff to respond to interrogatories, requests for production of documents, and requests for admissions; and (2) defendant Soltanian’s requests for sanctions. For the reasons set forth below, this court will grant defendant’s motion to compel with respect to the requests for production of documents and reserve ruling on defendant’s motion with respect to the interrogatories and requests for admissions until defendant provides additional information. In addition, this court will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.