(HC)Higgs

(HC)Higgs v. Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20232:21-cv-02415California523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAURICE D. HIGGS, No. 2:21-CV-02415-KJM-DMC-P Petitioner,

ORDER

v. B. CATES, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of California local rules. On September 21, 2022, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. The court writes separately only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.