Manning

(PC) Wilson v. Manning

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20232:21-cv-01801California457 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TREVELL BUCEAN WILSON, No. 2:21-cv-1801 DAD AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TODD MANNING, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed an in forma pauperis affidavit in which he states that he has $1,100 at his disposal. ECF No. 2. A prisoner trust fund account statement also reflects that plaintiff has maintained an account balance ranging between $1,041 and $1,751 in the four months preceding the initiation of this action. In order to commence an action, plaintiff must file a complaint as required by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and plaintiff must either pay both the $350.00 filing fee and the $52.00 administrative fee for a civil action, or file an application requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). The court may authorize the

1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.