(HC) Hickman v. People of State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20232:18-cv-02967California538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN DUANE HICKMAN, No. 2:18-cv-02967-KJM-CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 5, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 52. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 53. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.