Fox

(PC) Birrell v. Fox

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20232:16-cv-01818California376 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID WESLEY BIRRELL, et al., No. 2:16-cv-1818 KJM CKD P Plaintiffs, v. ORDER ROBERT W. FOX, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs, state prisoners proceeding pro se and individually, have filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 4, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein recommending that plaintiffs Loughmiller, Preyer and Acevedo be dismissed. ECF No. 60. The findings and recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The court notes that copies of the August 4, 2022, findings and recommendations served upon plaintiffs Acevedo and Loughmiller were returned by the U.S. Postal Service. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.