King

King v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20232:20-cv-01326California4,927 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

KELLAN S. PATTERSON, ESQ. SB No. 307190 Law Office of Kellan Patterson 2 2450 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95833

P: (916) 905-7265

F: (916) 721-2742

E: info@kellanpatterson.com Attorney for Plaintiff TRAVIS KING 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVIS KING, an individual, No. 2:20-cv-1326-KJM-DB Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE

ORDER

v.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, as a municipality, JONATHAN HOUSTON, in his individual capacity, ANTHONY BOLER, in his individual capacity, ERIC KLOCKENBRINK, COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION and DOES 1-100; Defendants. 19 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated 24 Protective Order. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.