Ross

(PS) Ferreira da Silva v. Ross

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20232:21-cv-01208California286 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDRA FERREIRA da SILVA, No. 2:21-cv-1208-KJM-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARY MARKEY, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(19). On November 17, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.